White label SEO pricing (5 figures)

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

9 of the 31 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 22 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 1 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 285 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the median, minimum and maximum PUBLISHED wholesale price per client per month across every white-label supplier that advertises one on its own site, held apart by service line (local SEO, national SEO, link building, content, platform fee) and normalised to one currency with the read date's rate, with the supplier's own currency and country kept on every row; the share of suppliers publishing a wholesale price against gating it behind a partner login; the volume steps and minimum commitments each publishes; and the entry price against what the tier actually contains.

Nobody publishes it: the round-ups rank suppliers without their prices, the suppliers publish their own price and nobody else's, and the whole market quotes a range.

285 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.